Mind the gender price gap

PRICING: SAME FOR MEN AND WOMEN?

 

Last year, price policies made headlines with disclosures that functionally equivalent products like razors and blades were priced higher for women than for men. Boots took action within weeks, reviewing its pricing with and making changes, with the statement:

This review has reassured us that for Boots own brands the two reported examples, Boots disposable razors and Botanics eye roll-on, are indeed exceptional cases which do not completely meet our principles and we are taking action to correct these prices.

Now Tesco has also changed its pricing so razors cost the same for men as for women. It said: '...following an internal review and discussions with our suppliers, we have acted on concerns about the difference in price of our female and male disposable twin-blade razors, in line with our commitment to ensure consistently low, simple and affordable pricing.'

In 2017, more retailers are likely to follow this model and eliminate the gender price gap (sometimes known as the pink tax) so that functionally equivalent products are priced the same, regardless of whether the target market is male or female. But this same pricing trend is not as widespread among hair stylists. How many other product categories will move toward gender-neutral pricing in 2017?