Brands, transparency and social media

Brands are understandably concerned about how consumers view marketing activities on social media and, actually, how social media influence consumers and society.

For instance, are brands transparent about who they are and what they do in advertising and social media? Among UK consumers responding to a recent survey, more than half say brands are not transparent about their use of social-media influencers. This is a small part of a larger challenge that has been developing in recent years.

Unilever is unhappy with the way social media are being used to spread hate and divide society. Given the company's multibillion-pound advertising/social media budget, its ideas and its expenditures are closely watched by the marketing world.

The company recently outlined a three-point pledge to publicly demonstrate its commitment to positive communications and transparent digital interaction.

• Unilever will not do business with any social media platform that fails to protect children or that fans the flames of societal divisions.
• Unilever will continue to fight stereotypes and promote diversity through initiatives like its #unstereotype campaign.
• Unilever will support digital channels that make a good customer experience their priority.

YouTube, for one, has publicly responded, saying: 'We want to do the right set of things to build [Unilever’s] trust. They are building brands on YouTube, and we want to be sure that our brand is the right place to build their brand'.